degringolade: (Default)

I don't really have a good sense of the way things are going to be going in the future. Granted that the trajectory of things a couple or four lifetimes past my expiration date seem pretty well set (at least in my humble opinion), the closer the predictions come to current events, the less certain my thoughts become.

Folks in this particular cul de sac of the net seem to be pretty much agreed that the end game is baked in. Beyond that though, the specious and premature arguments (including those of this humble correspondent) are really just coping mechanisms for the author(s). Shit is changing, and we have no clue which way it will go. So write away, bitch about the change, let it out. The society as a whole is moving away from your ideal. That doesn't mean that the movement is wrong, it is just the change.

degringolade: (Default)

So: We have five senses (some people would argue that we have more, but let's not go there for the sake of this argument). These senses aren't particularly good at taking in the inputs and thus generate a pretty impressive error rate.

Somewhere in the multitasking hunk of meat that we carry about, we take the data being generated by these senses into some kind of processing unit somewhere in the hunk o' meat and process the suspect incoming data using a system that is notoriously opaque and appears to be quite variable between individuals. The processing unit (wherever) then takes this suspect data and through some unknown (and probably again quite variable) process generates a very suspect mental model that we take to be the truth of the matter at a particular moment. Right now I am looking out at a not-quite-bucolic scene of a little courtyard that constitutes the view out of my window. Oops that sense-impression is already obsolete.

But then I have to look at very concept of sense-impression. My "reality" is composed of innumerable "slices" of these sense-impressions (which, I cannot state strongly enough are suspect) which are tossed into a mosh-pit of an astonishingly flawed memory where they rub up against each other and a weird, almost nonsensical consensus is achieved through the good offices of a process that is poorly understood and is unusually variable between individuals.

All of these profoundly inconsistent processes occur at once and every once in a while we make the quite-uninformed decision to try and explain what the sense-impression was. Then we need to talk about language. Right now you are reading this using English. Which is a language that is particularly well suited to misdirection and misunderstanding (why do you think lawyers are needed? They are there because they are quite good at black=white).

So you are looking at a minimum of four processes that allow you to communicate your thoughts to others. Each of these processes have a absurdly high failure rate. That is why I tend to think that the idea of understanding other humans is so fraught with peril and goes wrong routinely.

I think that I am done philosophizing today. It is a pretty outside, the big oak tree's leaves are starting to change and it isn't raining. Time for shoes and socks and a walk.

Maybe later I will eat a gummi and drink a beer.

degringolade: (Default)

Bagels: 13 for $6.00 or $0.46 each Velveeta: 24 slices for 3.88 or $0.16 each Spam: 12 ounce can ($3.88) cut into 12 slices or $0.32 use two(2) slices) so $0.64) Egg: 18 eggs ($3.26) or $0.18 per egg

$1.44 for Total cost

The current price for a Sausage McMuffin with Egg in Portland, Oregon, is approximately $5.59.

Takes about ten minutes (includes time for toasting bagel and heating griddle)

degringolade: (Default)

So: here in Portland we had a pretty large showing for the No Kings march. This was no surprise. There are discussions about crowd size, but that kind of thing is like comparing sizes in other venues, the people doing the estimates have a vested interest in either under or over-estimation.

I will be generous and give the range of 30,000 to 50,000 the benefit of the doubt.

The Portland metro area is officially defined as thePortland–Vancouver–Hillsboro Metropolitan Statistical Areaand includes seven counties: Clackamas, Columbia, Multnomah, Washington, and Yamhill in Oregon, and Clark and Skamania in Washington

So the overall population of the area is between 2.4 and 2.7 million. Now despite the long-term "blue" nature of the area, there is a couple of things to consider: 1) the reds aren't voiceless, they do probably constitute around 40%, so we can safely assume they will have a smaller relative need to attend. So of the 2.55 million, we can safely reduce the total for the area population to around 1.5 million that would be interested in the march.

Then there is the nature of the outlying areas. Clark and Skamania can be safely pulled out. They really don't like to be thought of as part of Portland so their contribution can be minimal. I am pulling around 300K from the total of "interested" to yield around 1.2 million. Yamhill and Columbia only add around 150K so that will pull out another 100K to yield a total population of potential interested parties to around 1.1 million.

I will use the official estimate of 40,000 for the next step. 40,000/1,100,000 yields around 3.6% of the target population that feel they need to demonstrate.

Tell you the truth, being a long term resident of the area, that feels about right.

Now onto the next completely personal observation with little or no "scientific validation". I felt that there was a very large contingent of grey hair. Portland is a pretty young city. Best numbers I can come up with is only around 18% being over 60. But I might be wrong here, but my feel of what I observed was upwards of 40% (a straight scientific wild ass guess) was grey hairs.

Now I am not at all certain what his means, I am just presenting my observations.

I will wait a couple of days to see if the march has any effect.

I am agnostic on this.

degringolade: (Default)

Physics theories of the 19th century assumed that just as surface water waves must have a supporting substance, i.e., a "medium", to move across (in this case water), and audible sound requires a medium to transmit its wave motions (such as air or water), so light must also require a medium, the "luminiferous aether", to transmit its wave motions. Because light can travel through a vacuum, it was assumed that even a vacuum must be filled with aether. Because the speed of light is so great, and because material bodies pass through the aether without obvious friction or drag, it was assumed to have a highly unusual combination of properties. Designing experiments to investigate these properties was a high priority of 19th-century physics.

The above is quoted from wikipedia. It is part of the article on the Michaelson-Morley experiments that "disproved" the existence of the "luminiferous ether".

I studied this during a summer undergraduate cram course in physics. All three quarters of "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" that was a requirement for my BS. Eight weeks of pure hell. I did get a B. But I was just learning how to think about all of the "proofs" offered by a consortium of scientists post Isaac Newton (and all of the guys were really smart guys) that led up to the then current world model of science.

Lately, in my dotage and with the ongoing crisis of reproducibility in science, I have been going back in time to review the basis of my beliefs. It hasn't been going all that well for my "natal" belief systems.

When you read about the M and M experiment, and then when you consider the theory, they didn't disprove anything. But they did do a good experiment. But as I read over the results, I can't really say that they "disproved" anything, all they did is proved that space/light doesn't act exactly like a physical substance like water.

Look science does work pretty well the greater bulk of the time, I got no beef with that. But truthfully I can't say that it is anything other than a belief system with nodules of experimental results that have to go through peoples heads to assign meaning. It is that assignment that is the problem.

degringolade: (Default)

Now, let's be completely honest.

  • I don't have good sources for what I think that I understand about the clusterfuck that is going on in the Pontic Steppes. I do read folks who state (A) is completely true and will result in a particular result. Then I read another "expert" who categorically states that (A) is completely false and will yield the opposite result.
  • My military experience is forty years stale and while I have tried to stay abreast of the issues, my training is from long ago and far away and forged by fighting a different kind of war.

Now that my bona fides had been (dis)established, I can pull anything out of my ass as analysis and you will hopefully not consider anything that I write here as expert testimony. It is just the best I can do with the meager resources that I can bring to bear. My history of prognostications is spotty in the extreme and while I treasure my occasional correct prophecy, lets not for a moment think that that flavor is all that common.

  • It seems the Russians are rolling back the Ukranians and look to be continuing doing so in the none too distant future. I really can see how Ukraine can keep anything east of the Dnieper if they continue this tomfoolery.

  • The Russians have a positive kill ratio. The numbers that I trust the most lets me think that they have a 3:1 advantage.

  • The Russian population is not against the war, the conscriptions and the voluntary enlistments will more than make up for their combat losses. I don't think that Ukraine will be able to truthfully make that same claim.
  • Europe has spent the last thirty years becoming a petting zoo. Their militaries are too small and their populations too comfortable. They have relied on the American umbrella for too long. Their leaders might well want to fight, but the populations probably don't have it in them
  • We have an established history of messing around overseas and then cutting our losses and heading back home with a couple of nice oceans between us and the problems.
degringolade: (Default)

One of the things that I have realized is that I, like almost everyone, suffer from the need to cast my actions in a light that makes me "right" somehow. I find this habit annoying in other people and when I discover it in myself, I want to become physically ill.

I do try and look at my current relative poverty and the subsequent lack of spending as a product of choices made twenty years ago, when I decided that the number in my "earnings" column really had nothing to do with my level of contentment. While the American dream worked for most everyone else I knew, the commitments needed were incompatible with how I wanted my life as structured.

So, I run my life like a reasonably intelligent man of limited means. It isn't all that hard. Once you stop listening to electronic voices telling you to buy an item, your costs go way down. But there is another insidious set of voices out there who want to help you. I find this group much nicer and much more likely to insinuate their beliefs and tastes into your life without proper analysis and reflection.

degringolade: (Default)

Look, Donald Trump doesn't have any good choices left to him. All of the choices are bad. Even if he were smart enough to discover an available "good choice" (which he isn't) the fact that such an option is not available to him anyway makes the whole process academic.

I think that the powers in congress and the courts and in industry are trying to minimize the impact to their individual fiefdoms. That is to be expected. But the overall governance is going to be who actually manages to keep getting more than their fair share and everyone else who will suck it.

I figure that I can squeak by, but it might well be a close race.

Next post will be all about making a virtue of necessity.

degringolade: (Default)

I tend to think that things could be made a lot better here in the fantasyland of the internet if, when some idiot (an example is the author of this site) when making a claim of some type about how the world is coming to an end or otherwise going to hell, would have a footnote section where the articles/posts/emails that precipitated the rant were at the bottom of the piece.

Just saying.

degringolade: (Default)

I love me some hippies, as a rule, they are super easy to get along with and they are low stress friends. I have a lot of good things to say about them.

But, in my mind, they do have some myopias that, while harmless, send them into passive/aggresive defenses of just why their choices are the only way to look at things. Yesterday I stopped by JMG's joint for the Frugal Friday discussion (it is getting to be my favorite weekly there) and had the temerity to mention that you should use half of the sugar required in any American recipe for sweets and maybe swap in some molasses. I suppose that I should have stopped there.

Then I mentioned the unmentionable fact that honey is (1) not something poor people can afford except as a luxury and (2) If you can afford it, it probably is not unadultrated and has a very high percentage of "not honey" in it. Now granted, I probably used wrongspeech to convey that sad little factoid, so I have to take my licks for that.

But most of the comments centered around how honey is needed and is essential for proper hippy living. I suppose that is totally acceptable, but it is beside the point. My contention is that honey is for rich folks.

I think that my point is that a simple sugar (chemical term, not advertising, but a chemical desription) is part of diets since god only knows when. Commercial white sugar, made from cane is no better or worse for you than honey. What is bad for you is simply eating too much of it. Molasses is a by product of the process of making the white sugar. Brown sugar that you buy in stores is just white sugar with a dab of molasses mixed in to make you think that it is less refined.

I am back to using sugar in my tea. A teaspoon in my 16 ounce insulated adult sippy cup weighs 4 grams. That is not going to kill me. What will kill me is a 12 ounce Coca Cola slipping me 39 grams.

Sugar is just a form a fuel. You engine can use it just fine. That is of course, providing you don't overdo it. A long time ago and far away, I needed to take courses in Clinical and Analytical toxicology for grad school requirements. One of the mantras back then was "the only difference between a medicine and a poison is dosage".

degringolade: (Default)

Sometimes when I talk to people of my generation, I begin to realize just how weird we are.

We seem to have as many flavors of history running about in our collective consciousness as Baskin Robbins has flavors of ice cream. About seventy percent of us (Da Boomahs) spent a lot of time remembering the things we did right and conveniently forgetting the things we did wrong. twenty percent seem to only remember the bad things that we did and refuse to acknowledge the good. The other ten percent are a strange breed combining nihilism with confusion and an overload of conflicting facts and perceptions.

But regardless of the flavor of the individual boomah, for some reason they get pissy when you acknowledge that there are more ways to look at it than is found in their version of established truth.

They just know it when they see it.

degringolade: (Default)

So here in Portlandia, folks are trying to whip up some meaningful protest against what they see as the "government repression". This time though it appears to be pretty weak sauce. The hullaballoo just seems to have lost it's mojo here.

I have a sneaking hunch that the folks who were the rank and file of the prior protests don't really see all that much of a problem. Either that or they are just too worried about paying the rent and keeping their day-to-day going to spend a lot of effort on things that don't really impact them directly. The usual suspects who push their way into the viewfinder of the television cameras are still there, but when I listen to them, I don't think that they convey the same intensity as they had back in the early 20's.

Nope, this time seems a little different. Not better, not worse, just different. The mojo just isn't there. Five years ago, if you claimed either opposition or indifference, you were immediately castigated and labels as a fascist too. Now the folks there can't quite seem to work up that same level of passion.

It is too early to tell, but it doesn't look like things are going to go too apeshit here in Portlandia this time around. Granted, there will be some tomfoolery, but I don't think that it will rise anywhere close to 2020 levels. Of course, I could be wrong, I frequently am wrong, but I just don't feel it.

degringolade: (Default)

I have a piss-poor record as a prophet/prognosticator. I have to recognize that out of the blocks. But the nasty feeling that "not good things" are getting ready to happen is pretty strong.

But this time, the waiting seems a little less interminable and I am not feeling all that angsty about the process. This might be because I am quite comfortable with my lack of omniscience and the all-too-frequent failures of crises to appear when I predict them have finally sunk in. So I am pretty chill about the mummery being played out on the world stage.

I think the phenomenon that pushed me over the line from worry to acceptance was a multi-decade run of participation trophies and consumer surveys.

Participation trophies are part of the cult of the child that we here in 'Murca have foisted on ourselves to give the false impression that everyone is a winner and everyone is a valued participant.

Consumer surveys want to give the unsuspecting a false impression that the company cares about anything other than relieving your wallet from those pesky dollars. I seriously doubt that asking about your "experience" with the pizza that just came to your door means anything more than trying to trick you into giving addition money at a later date.

We have been sold a bill of goods about the idea that everyone's opinion is taken into account and is actually important. I can see nothing in the real world that supports this absurd claim. It is the wellspring of the odd idea that a majority of 50.1% has the right to completely fuck over and ignore the 49.9%.

Society is the sea that the individual swims in. Somehow we have become adherents of King Canute, who feel that we have the right and responsibility to order the tide of a society to conform to our demands.

Society is a frustrating amalgam of the various sub-tribes which it is made of. The sub-tribes themselves are amalgams of subgroups struggling to control that particular tribes wants. The individuals that make up the tribe are lost in the dilution.

Here in the land 'o the free we have devolved into so many factions that we no longer have a means of compromise. This is in the process of being worked out. But there is a rough patch ahead of us.

I think we will manage. Maybe Churchill's apocryphal comment is closer to describing our country than the pablum that is forced down our throats by leaders:

“Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.”

degringolade: (Default)

I didn't really do squat this last weekend. Sunday was especially bad. I am not really ashamed or anything, but the inability to let go of the idea that I must be doing something useful every day is sometimes annoying.

This weekend was a little odd in term of social contact. A call from a relative got sidetracked into a right wing rant. When I agreed with the description of symptoms everything was fine. When I pointed out that a lot of the symptoms were self-inflicted and that we need to spend some time cleaning up our own mess, I was pretty much accused of being Antifa. Strange and odd world. Apparently (and I apologize for missing this) we are a God-fearing country who only does the best that we can do and any criticism must be silenced.

So, after the call I relaxed. I did manage to talk myself out of drinking, as that would definitely not made anything better. So as I was relaxing, I got yet another call. This time an old friend who spent the entire time smugly telling me about just how perfect his life seems to be. This one was less an onerous duty, as it seems he is convincing himself as much as he is convincing me. I did listen and compliment, but I did realize that definitions of success vary widely, even among people who know each other well.

I think that I could have been more relaxed if I only received one of these calls a day. But back to back, it got a little hard to take. All involved are boomers, early and middle flavor and it seems that they are trying on different participation trophies to see which one looks shiniest on their mantles. I suppose that I do the same, but since my achievements are less physical and my physical assets are meager, it is more difficult to fully participate in the seeming important dick-matching that passes for bragging here in boomerland.

degringolade: (Default)

Overall, I am pretty much at peace with the change of seasons, but as I get older I am noticing that winter is less and less welcome. Living in a "warm-summer Mediterranean (Köppen Csb) type, characterized by mild, wet winters and warm, dry summers" has a lot to commend it as the winters have been getting milder in the nearly forty years I have been here.

I am convinced by the climatologist's argument that the climate is changing. I am certain that is happening, the only thing that I question is the degree that human activity will be able to make a correction to the current state of affairs. Truthfully, I am leery about the significance of the correlation between CO2 levels and temperature. But even that particular data set makes me ambivalent (a fancy word of leery).

While there is a 50% increase in my lifetime (from 300 ppm to 450 ppm), I tend to look at such a thing as correlative, not confirmatory. I think that a lot of the discussion over this kind of thing is a variant on William Randolph Hearst's great quote "You furnish the pictures, and I'll furnish the war". Only in this case the word "pictures" need to be replaced with "powerpoint graph" as that appears to be the modern fuse for action.

Most of us are in buildings and rooms all the time. That being said, the data for a well-ventilated room shows CO2 level below 1,000 ppm as the touchstone. Now lets phrase that number differently. The current CO2 level here in Portland is 0.0428%. When you are inside in a well-ventilated room the number can go up to 0.100% with no serious effects on our peculiar species.

Why I am leery is the way that a single number in a complex and not particularly well understood phenomenon is bandied about, trumpet-like, in what I suspect is a more a advertising campaign for continued funding than a concrete touchstone for climate change (and I need to reiterate this again: I do believe that climate change is happening).

I do strongly believe that the problem is the energy being dumped into the environment by the burning of fossil fuels. We have gone from 23 billion barrels of oil burned in 1980 to around 35 billion barrels today. I find the correlation between percentage increase of atmospheric CO2 and percentage increase of fossil fuel use to be telling.

Like it or not, the problem is pretty simple. Energy use must decrease. Oil will go away, this will solve the CO2 problem which is strongly correlated to climate change. The incredibly profligate use of fossil fuels as an energy source will go away because Mother Hubbard's cupboard will become more and more sparse.

I think that my granddaughter gets to be my age, she will not think well of the persons living today and merrily burning through the "fun chips" that oil provides us.

degringolade: (Default)

A lot of my readers will probably find this post offensive. Not because I am talking about politics or sex or the usual offenses against good taste, but instead I will talk about a means of wasting time that I have episodically used to shield myself from the vagaries of a world that I no longer understand.

World of Warcraft has been around for over 20 years now. I first began playing it when I was the last man standing in a failing biotech firm. The powers that were spend their time scraping together rent and the nickels for my salary without bothering to actually spend money to produce product. So for three months, I went into the lab and spent time playing WOW. Got paid for it. Life was pretty good in an odd way.

I was deeply into "winning" back then. I actually had a character that the other players were impressed with. But that was then. Now I am playing an hour or two every day split up over two or three sessions (my chair and the table that serves as a combined kitchen table/desk are not ergonomic and I need to get up and move around between).

I still play what is referred to as "classic". It is the same old, non-improved game that I played 20+ years ago. I have a sneaking hunch that a fair number the folks there are like me in that they are older and not interested in bells and whistles, and don't want to go to the effort of Dungeons and Dragons. A lot of folks seem to noodle around in the game without taking it seriously and trying to "win".

I believe that I will try not to do that. It is possible as a "strategy" to just be lower-middle class in the game, wandering about, making some coin when you can, and not get into the digital dick matching of winning. In a sense, you can just play the game without needing to "win". I have been doing this mindless thing for a couple of days now and I find that the frame of mind I play in actually relaxes me and fills up part of the day of a retired old man.

Now, I kinda feel like I have to keep quiet about this around my friends. I have a set of "successful" friends who feel like their means of filling the day are superior to mine. If they find out that I am not filling my days with meaningful activity that advances me in some way, they will spend time trying to "set me straight". I don't want any of that flavor, thank you very much.

degringolade: (Default)

All men, all women, all children have their illusions, and those illusions both sustain and destroy them.

The counterpoint to illusion is not truth, not in the way in which truth is now and apparently always has been defined by human beings, although many would claim such. Truth is, as popularly accepted, just another form of illusion, if a well-meaning illusion, because, over time, it has been corrupted from its original meaning, which was conformity to reality. As culture and language developed, men applied the term to words, or more properly, nouns, then next to principles, and finally to beliefs. Yet none of those conform directly to reality.

Nouns are single-word terms that attempt to name or describe either something real or something unreal, but no word encompasses the completeness of whatever is being so named. Every noun is at best a name of the principal attribute of what it purports to represent.

When one applies the term “true” or “truth” to belief in a deity, how can a belief in the existence of any deity be true, or even false, when there is no demonstrable physical proof of the existence of that deity?

In the end, truth as it is, and not as so many have described it to serve their own ends, can only be the open acceptance of what is. Not what we remember, not what we hope for, not what we fear, not what we love … but what is. Nothing more and nothing less.

For the truths that men claim, in their vaunted principles, and in the governments that they have built based on those principles, and will build long after I am gone, are all part of the grand illusion that words can describe all of what exists.

AVERRA The City of Truth Johan Eschbach 377 TE

Modesitt, Jr., L. E.. Contrarian: A Novel in the Grand Illusion (p. 611). (Function). Kindle Edition.

degringolade: (Default)

I have been a frugal prepper doomer for a while now. If you have the poor time management skills required to go back to my blogger account and the older posts here on Dreamwidth, you will see an amazing assortment of predictions concerning how the whole damn thing was going to blow up.

I am pleased to announce that while it still looks shaky, it is still holding together somehow. Granted, it doesn't resemble anything that I would call stable, but truthfully I don't see any difference in intensity, just a dance of the political flavors of the faction that is currently predicting doom.

Right now I am approaching the end of the slide from upper middle class affluence to working class adequacy to retirement frugality. I have enough. My income exceeds my outgo by a touch and there is room to cut costs even more. I have a feeling that a lot more people will be joining me on this path and if they manage their expectations, they will find out that they are probably just as happy.

The "doom" that is coming isn't armageddon, and even if it was there isn't a damn thing anyone can do about it. Nope the doom will be the reconfiguration of expectations. In our keep up with the Joneses and status/money seeking society, this will be painful for a great number of folks.

degringolade: (Default)

For some reason I woke up at 05:00 this morning and knew that going back to sleep wasn't an option. Kinda wish I knew why, but nothing comes to mind.

I have been huddling down of late. I am retreating into the areas of my life where more certainty is possible. That does not include anything other than a brief scan of news headlines to see if the direction has changed any at all. It does appear that the trend toward nastiness and name-calling continues apace with no real change in intensity. The conditions in the proxy wars we have so come to love are proceeding smartly along their path to failure. The economy of the rich is doing fine, the economy of everyone else is beginning to show signs of going off the rails.

Growing up in a family of fairly recent immigrants (My grandma was the first person to actually speak fluent English, Great-grandfather came to America as a draft dodger who decided that being drafted to the Austro-Hungarian Empire's army in 1913 was a losing proposition). But Italian was the milk tongue of the family until the 1950's and I caught the tail end of that. But there was a phrase that stuck: Tempo Freddo (cold times).

When used in the house, it didn't refer to weather outside. That was other phrases involving dogs and when outside vulgarity. Nope, tempo freddo was for when the craziness was closing in. I remember it being used a lot in the late sixties when I stayed at the farm for the summers (I was farm labor before it was cool).

I am tempted to start using it again. But I won't. That reference is from a time and culture that was dying fifty years ago. But the craziness is closing in. We are in the process of choosing sides to lay blame. But the actions happening here and now can't really be "blamed" on one side of the other. We would have arrived at this exact same place regardless of what political faction "won" the last election and exerts nominal control. The only difference is in which group of assholes is currently being repressed.

degringolade: (Default)

I am sorta sick of the shenanigans currently going on in the "land o' the free".

I am ignoring it and concentrating my limited mental resources on playing World of Warcraft and pretending the world out there doesn't matter to me.

That's all. I am not ashamed.

Profile

degringolade: (Default)Degringolade

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 1415 16 17
18 19 20 2122 23 24
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 07:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios